-40%

76 cm long, Khazar Empire semi-nomadic iron sword, 650-965 AD

$ 2376

Availability: 94 in stock
  • Style: Middle Eastern
  • Condition: genuine stable rust, do not required additional preservation;

    Description

    76 cm long, Khazar Empire semi-nomadic iron sword, 650-965 AD
    Length: 76 cm = 30 inches;
    Length of the blade: 69 cm = 27.25 inches;
    Weight: 448 g;
    Condition: genuine stable rust, do not required additional preservation;
    Provenance: Private collection in London, United Kingdom; before -
    Private Oxfordshire collection; formerly acquired on the European art market from pre-2000 collections.
    References: The
    Khazars
    [a]
    (
    /ˈxɑːzɑːrz/
    ) were a semi-
    nomadic
    Turkic people
    that in the late 7th-century AD established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern
    European Russia
    ,
    southern Ukraine
    ,
    Crimea
    , and
    Kazakhstan
    .
    [11]
    They created what for its duration was the most powerful
    polity
    to emerge from the break-up of the
    Western Turkic Khaganate
    .
    [12]
    Astride a major artery of commerce between
    Eastern Europe
    and
    Southwestern Asia
    , Khazaria became one of the foremost trading empires of the
    early medieval
    world, commanding the western
    marches
    of the
    Silk Road
    and playing a key commercial role as a crossroad between
    China
    , the
    Middle East
    and
    Kievan Rus'
    .
    [13]
    [14]
    For some three centuries (c. 650–965) the Khazars dominated the vast area extending from the Volga-Don steppes to the eastern
    Crimea
    and the northern
    Caucasus
    .
    [15]
    Khazaria long served as a
    buffer state
    between the
    Byzantine Empire
    and both the nomads of the northern steppes and the
    Umayyad Caliphate
    and
    Abbasid Caliphate
    , after serving as the Byzantine Empire's proxy against the
    Sasanian Empire
    .
    The alliance was dropped around 900.
    Byzantium began to encourage the
    Alans
    to attack Khazaria and to weaken its hold on Crimea and the Caucasus and sought to obtain an
    entente
    with the rising Rus' power to the north, which it aspired to convert to Christianity.
    [16]
    Between 965 and 969, the
    Kievan Rus'
    ruler,
    Sviatoslav I of Kiev
    , as well as his allies, conquered the capital,
    Atil
    , and ended Khazaria's independence. The brief rump state that ensued was again overrun, and the Khazars were dispersed or absorbed into surrounding populations.
    Determining the origins and nature of the Khazars is closely bound with theories of
    their languages
    , but it is a matter of intricate difficulty since no indigenous records in the Khazar language survive, and the state was
    polyglot
    and
    polyethnic
    .
    The native religion of the Khazars is thought to have been
    Tengrism
    , like that of the
    North Caucasian Huns
    and other Turkic peoples.
    [17]
    The poly-ethnic populace of the Khazar Khaganate appears to have been a multi-confessional mosaic of pagan, Tengrist, Jewish, Christian and Muslim worshippers.
    [18]
    Some of the Khazars (i.e.,
    Kabars
    ) joined the ancient Hungarians in the 9th century.
    The ruling elite of the Khazars was said by
    Judah Halevi
    and
    Abraham ibn Daud
    to have converted to
    Rabbinic Judaism
    in the 8th century,
    [19]
    but the scope of the
    conversion to Judaism
    within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain.
    [20]
    Where the Khazars dispersed after the fall of the Empire is subject to many conjectures. Proposals have been made regarding the possibility of a Khazar factor in the ethnogenesis of numerous peoples, such as the
    Hazaras
    ,
    Hungarians
    , the
    Kazakhs
    , the
    Cossacks of the Don
    region and of
    Ukraine
    ,
    Bukharan Jews
    , the Muslim
    Kumyks
    , the Turkic-speaking
    Krymchaks
    and their Crimean neighbors the
    Crimean Karaites
    , the
    Moldavian Csángós
    , the
    Mountain Jews
    , even some
    Subbotniks
    (on the basis of their Ukrainian and Cossack origin and others).
    [21]
    [22]
    [23]
    The late 19th century saw the
    emergence of the theory
    that the core of today's
    Ashkenazi Jews
    are descended from a hypothetical Khazarian Jewish diaspora which migrated westward from modern-day Russia and Ukraine into modern-day France and Germany.
    Linguistic and genetic studies have not supported the theory of a Khazar connection to
    Ashkenazi Jewry
    .
    The theory still occasionally finds support, but most scholars view it with considerable skepticism.
    [24]
    [20]
    [25]
    The theory is sometimes associated with
    antisemitism
    [26]
    and
    anti-Zionism
    .
    [27]